Lead Letters: SNP
1.
We now know beyond all doubt and from the Scottish Government's own GERS figures that the SNP's 2014 case for independence was utterly false. We also know that the SNP as a party was willing to risk Scotland's economic future. It is clear that all future consideration of the SNP and its policies will take into account not only the failure of its case for independence, but also (and more importantly) their utterly duplicitous and deceitful record.
If the Better Together campaign had not succeeded, and if Project Fear had not been justified as Project Fact, Scotland would now have been on the brink of utterly ruinous independence. Nicola Sturgeon was at the centre of the pro-disaster campaign. She and her predecessor should never be forgiven by anyone who loves Scotland and indeed loves the truth. This includes the Scottish and UK media who gave equal credence to pro-independence economic lies as they did to reliable and trustworthy sources.We should never allow ourselves and our fellow citizens to be fooled by these charlatans again.
At the weekend, the First Minister announced that a new independence proposal will be launched ("Salmond: Sturgeon plotting referendum", The Herald, March 14). It must be seen by any sensible person in the light of the last one and the now proven fact that we cannot trust the SNP.
Even George W. Bush knew the saying,"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me".
Peter A. Russell,
87 Munro Road,
Jordanhill,
Glasgow.
2.
Once again David Torrance calls our attention to his perceived weaknesses in the SNP (“Sturgeon talks the talk but Better Together was right", The Herald, March 14).” Might I respond by pointing out the real "inconvenient truths" to be found in the three Unionist parties?
The Tories are irrevocably divided over Europe, leadership and immigration. The current war within the party will have long-lasting implications. Leading party members of government devouring each other in public indicates far greater “inconvenient truths” than any to be found in the SNP.
Even a fleeting glance would let David Torrance see the Labour Party split again into its inconvenient binary of social democrats in the right corner and socialists in the left corner, back-stabbing-daggers drawn in another bloody battle.
Labour has become unelectable as a party of government. However, there may be a role s a fringe protest movement replacing the inept, irrelevant and discredited Liberal Democrats.
The SNP on the other hand has shown the Scottish people (and others with its outstanding performance at Westminster) that it is a party that shows cohesion, competence and common sense, making Scotland a more confident country.
There are more challenges to be won: enabling greater enterprise, defeating poverty and ensuring social justice and providing sovereignty. In the face of the “inconvenient truths” of division and derision evident in the three Unionist parties, David Torrance should in fairness look again at the sound political management of the SNP.
Thom Cross,
18 Needle Green,
Carluke.
3.
Mervyn King, former Governor of the Bank of England, can see no problem in an independent Scotland using the pound, and he probably did tell Alex Salmond that the UK Government would take a different approach after a Yes vote.
In a second referendum this would be avoided if the vote was on a previously agreed negotiation where all these issues could be sorted out first.
All other UK referendums were votes on negotiated agreements. Given current eve of "Independence Day" recriminations on the economy we should also be entitled to a housebuyer's pack, an internationally audited and agreed estimate of our fiscal position, length of time to attain membership of, and wisdom of joining, international bodies such as Nato and the EU and the potential cost of transition of agencies, embassies and computer systems.
A Yes vote should be 60 per cent, not a simple majority. Such a decision requires an overwhelming majority of people voting in favour who are under no illusions as to he opportunities and challenges.
Allan Sutherland,
1 Willow Row,
Stonehaven.
4.
I read your headline ("Sillars facing calls to be expelled from the SNP2, The Herald, March 12) with much interest. After careful reflection, and as a party member, I would urge the party leadership not to yield to pressure to expel Mr. Sillars from the SNP.
In order to attain its ultimate goal the party has to reach out beyond its own membership and find common cause with those who support independence including Rise and the Greens. We need to build a broad church on the road to national self determination not an exclusive sect.
Roddy Mac Donald,
1 Glenmount Place,
Ayr.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel