THE Rev Bill Wallace (Letters, April 5) is to be commended for expressing his frustrations at the Church of Scotland's response on the general decline of Kirk attendances. His remarks trigger various scriptural references for consideration. A time to speak or a time to remain silent. Encouragingly the Rev. Wallace chose the former.
Where I am at variance with Mr Wallace is his apparent acceptance that the Kirk’s membership and attendance is still the largest of any organisation in Scotland. The membership/attendance ratio reveals an alarming statistic. From experience I would suggest many Kirk congregations barely muster a 20 per cent attendance, with 75 per cent of these being retired persons. This does not augur well for the Kirk unless a swift recruitment and retainment policy is implemented.
Allan C Steele,
22 Forres Avenue, Giffnock.
SURELY there is no swing away from religious belief in Scotland, but merely a move sideways to the Secular National Proselytizers?
John Birkett,
12 Horseleys Park,
St Andrews.
WITH the most recent Scottish Social Attitudes survey showing that 52 per cent of Scots are not religious it is official that Scotland is not a “Christian country.”
It must now be time to rethink the anachronistic advantages this particular religion enjoys: unelected representatives on local education committees, open-door access to the developing minds of state school children, taxpayers’ money given to “faith schools”, automatic stewardship of civic ceremonies, annual pageants proclaiming their affiliation with our judiciary. The list goes on.
As secularists we feel no schadenfreude at this predictable decline as all are entitled to their beliefs, but Christianity is now only a subset of a minority.
The state’s duty is to protect the right to private religious belief and not to privilege it.
Neil Barber,
Edinburgh Secular Society,
Saughtonhall Drive, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel