I CONFESS to deep disappointment and disbelief at reading Rosemary Goring's opinion contribution ("The United States finally has the president it deserves", The Herald, January 17). The country she describes is not one I recognise. Her article reflects the "post-truth" utterances of the media which appeared determined to get Hillary Clinton elected at all costs.
Probably the most important factor in the presidential election was trust or lack of it. Mrs Clinton had a track record of serious contraventions of the law and in fact details have just been released which shows that she sent highly secret emails to one of her team and that these emails were hacked by at least three countries, Russia, China and Israel. This in itself is a crime punishable by up to 10 years’ imprisonment. Couple that with the proven cheating to ensure she beat Bernie Sanders for the Democratic nomination and you can understand why a large proportion of the voters would have voted for a stray dog rather than her.
The Democratic Party itself had been done no favours by President Obama. In his departure speech he claimed five great achievements of his presidency but on inspection every one of them was seen to be a fallacy. In the case of race relations they have not been worse in the last 25 years in no small part because Mr Obama blamed every problem and criticism on racism. Unfortunately for him a lot of voters saw through the paucity of "Change you can believe in".
In this set of circumstances the voters saw Donald Trump as the lesser of two evils. Among ordinary Americans I speak to there is a positivity and optimism about the future. There appears to be a feeling that they have taken control of their own destiny and are ignoring the Hollywood luvvies and liberal media crying foul just because they lost. As the Chinese would say, "we live in interesting times".
David Stubley,
22 Templeton Crescent, Prestwick.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here