YOUR article on Operation Close (“Secret cyclist used in safety blitz by police”, The Herald, April 25) seems to me to be exactly the type of heavy police action employed when all else has failed in protecting pedal cyclists from motor vehicles. I feel that this is far from the case and solutions to the dangers posed to cyclists by cars overtaking them have to be more comprehensively explored.
East Dunbartonshire Council has adopted the public realm “shared spaces” concept in Kirkintilloch where cars, cyclists and pedestrians are considered to share the town centre with mutual courtesy. While I accept the scheme is still controversial, I wonder why, if it works for cars, we cannot have a similar scheme in our country footpaths for cycles?
I suggest that when the long-established laws prohibiting cycles using all footpaths were made, the balance between the use and needs of cars and pedestrians was very different to now and country footpaths were relatively busy as many more people walked, for example, to and from work. I suggest that this is seldom now the case and I am certain that if the law was changed such that cycles could use designated country footpaths, provided they physically stopped to one side to give right of way to pedestrians, it would be worth a trial period.
In such circumstances I would certainly advocate the heavy hand of the law if a cyclist, or indeed a pedestrian, failed to comply with the rules of sharing specific re-classified footpaths beside roadways.
Bill Brown,
46 Breadie Drive, Milngavie.
WHILE I am delighted to note the initiative of Police Scotland to protect cyclists from overly close passing by motorists I wonder why it has taken so long, and so many cycling deaths and injuries, for Britain to reach this point. Other nations have been addressing the problem for years.
Still, good luck to the project – better late than never.
Grant Young,
49 Doonvale Drive, Ayr.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel