I FIND myself in the uncomfortable position of writing in the defence of Donald Trump, a man I neither admire nor respect. Today, on both the broadcast media and in the press, he is being castigated for condemning “both sides” for the violence that occurred at Charlottesville (“Trump returns to blaming ‘all sides’”, The Herald, August 16). This despite his quite unequivocal, if tardy, denunciation of racists and white supremacists only the day before.
Freedom of expression is written into the United States Constitution in The First Amendment and, unlike here, one is perfectly entitled, with a few exceptions, to lawfully express views which might be considered both provocative and highly offensive. If you disagree with white supremacists, anti-Semites and racists generally, and I do, then the response is not to physically assault them but to either challenge them with reasoned argument or to expose the daftness of their beliefs to ridicule. In my view violence directed against extremists of any hue only helps to further their cause.
By condemning both sides President Trump is not asserting some moral equivalence between them but merely recognising that violence is never the answer when confronted with views you disagree with. Freedom of expression is not just for those with whom we agree.
Jim Meikle,
41 Lampson Road, Killearn.
THAT retiring creature of American folklore, Bigfoot, now has a somewhat less retiring rival in the White House. Bigmouth.
Irene Black,
50 Ballater Drive,
Bearsden.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel