YOUR troubling report on the state of computing education in Scottish schools dredges up a number of well-known issues for re-consideration (“Big exodus of computing science teachers harming pupils’ futures”, The Herald, November 10).
In terms of staffing in our secondary schools the context should be borne in mind. When computers started being placed in our schools in very many cases an existing teacher in a different discipline had to be quickly trained in-service to be confident to teach what was a new certificated subject in the school curriculum. Very many of these first-wave teachers have retired or are now reaching retiring age.
The challenge is perhaps to train sufficient committed teachers in dedicated “educational computing” courses rather than rely of a quick post-graduate course. If someone has a good university degree in computing I find it hard to believe they will have to spend very long serving in a coffee shop.
A major factor which cannot be over-emphasised is the status of the subject in the mind of possible teachers. Of the eight Curriculum for Excellence Areas, computing Science is not in fact classed explicitly as such within the guidance on Science Experiences and Outcomes. It appears within the overcrowded technologies which historically contains some subjects still not to be considered by some as the “core” subjects required for university entrance. Thus it is disadvantaged in some eyes, having doubts over the genuine cache that the suffix “ Science” should bring; being caught up in the debate over what is a technology and what is a science.
Another factor is the old chestnut which English always suffered from. If it is used daily across the curriculum why does it need to go solo? However, while English as a valuable subject is generally accepted as being worthy of certificated mainstreaming, computing activity often struggles even today for a strong identity in schools other than permeating as a utility. Young people studying computing have however rapidly growing speciality opportunities in careers such as required in aspects of modern accountancy including fraud detection and broader security needs. Additionally there is an expanding demand to meet the wide range of cyber-forensic investigations of the internet, banking and also safe data recording generally, where grounding at school must be considered invaluable.
Bill Brown,
46 Breadie Drive, Milngavie.
I NOTE with interest your recent article (“Headteachers 'riding roughshod' over the rights of parent councils”, The Herald, November 2).
As chairwoman of the National Parent Forum of Scotland, I acknowledge the concerns raised by Scottish Parent Teacher Council members over parental engagement – there is always room for improvement – but I feel it is also important to communicate our perspective. In our experience, there are many excellent positive partnerships between schools and parents that are making a real difference.
It is always easy to focus on examples where things can be better, but we should be cautious of doing a disservice to the many parent councils and schools all over Scotland that are working hard to improve relationships, reach out to parents, improve children's education, and make Scotland's education the best it can be.
Parents across Scotland have repeatedly told us that they don't want to control the running of our schools, but they do want to be treated as real partners. This takes respect and commitment on both sides, and joint working on the areas where there is a shared interest.
Many teachers, headteachers and parent councils are making real progress in developing their partnerships; moving on from tokenistic non-participation to real control over funds raised and decisions on school improvement. They recognise the vital role that parents can have in children's education.
We need to celebrate the progress and efforts of our parents, parent councils and schools, who are all striving each day to achieve the best possible education for our children.
Joanna Murphy,
Chairwoman, National Parent Forum of Scotland,
Rosebery House,
9 Haymarket Terrace, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here