I WAS delighted to read your article reporting the enlightened views of Sir Ian Wood on the proper purpose and values in secondary school education in Scotland (“Pressure to go to university is ‘damaging to pupils’ warns tycoon”, The Herald, June 14).
He points out that in the real world “many pupils who had a technical education earned higher salaries than those who went to university”. The question must be considered how the present culture in Scottish education of what I consider is essentially a coterie promoting academic incest seems to have developed.
I suggest that the formation of comprehensive secondary schools in the second half of the 20th century left many establishments which had been senior secondary schools with a legacy of nostalgia for intellectual elitism which still dies hard. Compounded with this background was the requirement that all teachers should be university graduates and hence have little probability of experience in, or hold parity of esteem for, alternative educational routes. Additionally, as our society began to identify itself as “ post-industrial” during the late 1970s so, in what I believe was an emerging panic, a university education gained unjustified ground as the safest pathway for all school leavers regardless of their eventual market value.
However, the role of the university-promoting Scottish Government in, by default, effectively marginalising the success of the majority of school leavers who wish to march to another tune cannot be ignored.
A solution to address the divisive attitude is for the Education Scotland School Inspectorate to be directed to be much bolder and more encouraging in the equitable reporting of all positive school leaver destinations as successes. The most recent statistics in 2017 show that 40 per cent of Scottish senior leavers went to university. Let us hear more praise and tributes for the 60 per cent and not allow any pupil to leave school with a heavy heart.
Bill Brown,
46 Breadie Drive,
Milngavie.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here