US General who led the campaign in the First Gulf War;
Born: August 22, 1934; Died: December 27, 2012.
Norman Schwarzkopf, who has died at the age of 78, was the US Commander known to his troops as Stormin' Norman who led the 100-hour ground war that routed the Iraqi army in 1991.
The burly Vietnam War veteran commanded more than 540,000 US troops and 200,000 allied forces, including 50,000 Brits, that not only routed Saddam Hussein's army from Kuwait but also gloriously capped his 34-year military career. Some experts hailed his plan to trick and outflank Hussein's forces with a sweeping armoured movement as one of the great accomplishments in military history.
Throughout the war, he was a familiar sight on television, clad in camouflage fatigues and a cap. He conducted fast-paced briefings and reviewed his troops with a purposeful stride. He was also extremely quotable. At one briefing he addressed Saddam's military reputation. "As far as Saddam Hussein being a great military strategist," he said, "he is neither a strategist, nor is he schooled in the operational arts, nor is he a tactician, nor is he a general, nor is he a soldier. Other than that, he's a great military man, I want you to know that."
Gen Schwarzkopf returned from the war a hero and there was talk of him running for public office. Instead he wrote an autobiography, It Doesn't Take a Hero, and served as a military analyst. He also acted as a spokesman for the fight against prostate cancer, with which he was diagnosed in 1993. He was also active in various charities for chronically ill children.
He was born in Trenton, New Jersey, the son of a policeman, and graduated from the US Military Academy in New York in 1956. He saw combat twice, first in Vietnam, where he led his men in firefights, and then in the 1983 Grenada invasion, where he commanded all US ground forces. His chestful of medals included three Silver and three Bronze Stars and two Purple Hearts for Vietnam wounds.
In 1988 he was put in charge of the US Central Command in Tampa, with responsibility for the Horn of Africa, the Middle East and south Asia. In that role, he prepared a plan to protect the Gulf's oil fields from a hypothetical invasion by Iraq. Within months, the plan was in use.
A soldier's soldier in an era of polished, politically conscious military technocrats, his mouth sometimes got him in trouble. In one interview, he said he had recommended to President George Bush that allied forces destroy Iraq's military instead of stopping the war after a clear victory.
He later apologised after both Mr Bush and Defence Secretary Dick Cheney fired back that there was no contradiction among military leaders to Mr Bush's decision to leave some of Saddam's military intact.
After retirement, he spoke his mind on military matters. He was ambivalent about the 2003 invasion of Iraq, saying he doubted victory would be as easy as the White House and the Pentagon predicted. He also criticised Donald Rumsfeld, the Defence Secretary at the time, telling The Washington Post that during war-time television appearances "he almost sometimes seems to be enjoying it".
He served in his last military assignment in Tampa, Florida, as commander-in-chief of US Central Command, the headquarters responsible for US military and security concerns in nearly 20 countries from the eastern Mediterranean and Africa to Pakistan.
He is survived by his wife, Brenda, two daughters and one son.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article