Former SNP councillor and activist
Former SNP councillor and activist
Born: December 17, 1942; Died: March 13, 2014. AN APPRECIATION
As a journalist I have always tried to keep a professional distance from top-of-the-tree politicians and activists who wield below-the-radar influence in their parties. Occasionally, I break the rule with people to whom I take a shine. Tom Brady was such a man. His death from cancer at the age of 71 comes as a profound shock to me.
For about a decade we socialised together, laughed a lot, gossiped outrageously and genuinely loved one another's company. In recent times, his assiduous attention to his duties as a grandfather left him to drift from the kind of close friendships and frenetic activism which had been the hallmarks of earlier periods of his life.
He was small in stature but big in personality. He was fun loving and carried himself around with a suggestively fruity laugh. He would often look at me oddly. I laughed at the way he laughed rather than any comic import in his conversation.
He had a journalist's curiosity about events and was an inveterate letter-writer to The Herald. He always had a sideways, often highly original take on events. He was a nationalist and interpreted events from that standpoint but he was never narrow. Although he was a party man, he was not blind to other opinions. He was mischievous in debate and wound-up his opponents with a twinkle in his eye. But he never took disagreements personally.
As an East End of Glasgow boy, he was aware of the tales of Red Clydeside. The spirit of Wheatley would have stirred a political curiosity and he had Labour sympathies long before he joined the SNP. But when his politics settled, it was in the Nationalist interest and he never wavered from the belief that self respect, social justice and self determination were a trinity of values that would transform the lives of those he cared about.
He was elected as a councillor for the Calton area in Glasgow in 1968. He had a lifelong eye for publicity, ably demonstrated when he suggested that a dead rat should be smuggled into the corporation to berate the housing convenor about the state of the city's stock. This was duly executed to the discomfort of the administration.
He could shake the opposition and no doubt that was central in the SNP selecting him as their candidate in the Gorbals by-election of 1969. After Winnie Ewing's victory at the Hamilton by-election in 1967, hopes were high but the voters did not succumb to thousands of posters and leaflets proclaiming "Tom Brady is the man".
When I met him, he had retired at the age of 49, having had an offer he could not refuse from the then SSEB or South of Scotland Electricity Board - a fat redundancy cheque and paid-up final salary pension. It allowed him to indulge his activism and play the stock market, which he did with moderate success.
With time on his hands, he might have thought about a second political career but he was a remarkably content man. He was always generous in advancing the cause of younger members and was particularly happy to support current minister Michael Matheson and the twice by-election candidate and former BBC journalist David Kerr. If he found someone pompous or overbearing, he was not above playing the dedicated apparatchik to deliver a career-ending vote of no confidence.
He was an uncomplicated person who took great contentment from family and friends, such as the veteran nationalist Ken Taylor. He also took great comfort from his faith. He was a spiritual rather than doctrinaire Catholic and was one of the first of that faith to be elected for the SNP in Glasgow. He was proud of that. How a little trail blazing has gone a long way.
All parties have activists of great ability and dedication. They go unnoticed but they are the lifeblood of their movement. What a pity Tom will not be around for September 18. When the result is known, I will allow myself a little quiet contemplation as I look skywards and ask: "What are we to make of it all Mr Brady?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article