One of the most vital aspects of parliamentary democracy is for the government of the day to face a credible Opposition.
At Westminster, Labour has palpably failed to hold the Tories to account over the last twelve months.
A combination of weak leadership by Jeremy Corbyn and never-ending internal strife has given David Cameron and now Theresa May a free pass. Scottish Labour is heading in the same rudderless direction.
Kezia Dugdale is correct on some fundamental issues of the day, such as using Holyrood’s tax powers to offset austerity, but grave doubts are growing about her leadership.
As we reveal today, three of the party’s biggest donors have been reluctant to put their hands in their pockets since she became leader.
At a time when Dugdale was trying, and failing, to hold on to second place at Holyrood, these donors decided against funding Scottish Labour. This decision speaks volumes about their faith in her.
She has also got caught up in the slipstream of the leadership row at Westminster and appears to be at odds with her deputy Alex Rowley.
However, it would be unfair to pin the state of Scottish Labour on someone who has only been in the job for about a year.
The party’s problems go back over a decade and, unlike Ruth Davidson, who had five years as leader before facing voters, Dugdale had to fight a Holyrood election within months of succeeding Jim Murphy.
Next year’s local government polls should have been the starting point for her comeback.
The SNP will have been in government for ten years and should be showing signs of wear and tear. On paper, Labour should be taking seats off the SNP.
Instead, a senior party figure has already told the Sunday Herald that Labour is preparing for defeat next year.
“It’s about managing expectations,” a senior source admitted.
If, as other senior insiders expect, Scottish Labour is routed next year, Dugdale will have nowhere to hide.
On her watch, the party will have slumped to a humiliating third place behind the Tories at Holyrood and watched its local government base wither as well.
Why is this important? This paper believes Scotland needs a vigorous centre-left opposition to an SNP Government that talks progressively on reserved matters but governs cautiously on devolved areas.
In reality, Nicola Sturgeon is faced by a rejuvenated Scottish Tory party that stands up for the usual narrow interests in the usual way.
Holyrood desperately needs Labour to mend itself and find its voice in a Parliament increasingly bogged down in Brexit and independence rows.
If Dugdale does not have the stomach for the fight, she should vacate the role and make way for someone who does.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here