THE SNP’s stunning UK general election result in 2015 was partly secured after a campaign opposing Tory austerity.
Nicola Sturgeon rightly pointed out that the reckless choices of the Conservatives were bad for public services.
However, Holyrood is no longer a bystander in the tax debate. Sweeping new powers, particularly over income tax, give MSPs the option of reversing spending cuts.
If the political will existed, Holyrood could raise the basic rate of income tax by 1p and increase the top rate from 45p to 50p.
Sadly, the Scottish Government is refusing to travel down this road. On tax, last week’s budget was nothing more than an inconsequential tweak of the current system.
Income tax rates for the rich and middle classes remain unaltered and local government had to swallow a cut, albeit a smaller dose of pain than was previously expected.
As we reveal today, the Government’s own advisor on poverty, Naomi Eisenstadt, has backed increased taxes for people earning over £100,000. We applaud her call.
If the Government is committed to reducing poverty and inequality, tax has to be in the foreground of decision-making. In particular, the tax rates of the rich must be increased.
This is not to say that a perfect society can be built on the backs of the 17,000 people who pay the “additional” 45p rate, but the Government must acknowledge that some of the cuts to public services can be avoided.
We need transformative changes that will reap tangible benefits on education and child poverty, not minor tweaks to an unsatisfactory status quo.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here