NO-ONE is suggesting staff at the Russian Consulate in Edinburgh had any knowledge of the nerve agent attack on ex-spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter.
But the SNP is right to say that the ever-widening investigation into the incident in Salisbury which left 21 people requiring medical treatment should not be curtailed by diplomatic immunity.
The Kremlin has denied any involvement in the attack but if police wish to speak to Russian officials in Edinburgh or London, steps should be taken to speak to anyone of interest. As Stephen Gethins MP said detectives should have access to all Russian officials.
The UK government can request a waiver of diplomatic immunity so that police can interview people of interest and if officers feel that is the correct course of action, nothing should not stand in the way of the investigation.
After all, there has been a chemical attack on British soil which has endangered the lives of British citizens, including a police officer who was first on the scene.
The brazen use of nerve agent must not go unpunished, otherwise hostile foreign powers will believe it is open season. As many have said, using a chemical weapon on British soil is tantamount to an act of war.
It is time for decisive action against those who have no respect for the rule of international law. Every stone must looked under, every person of interest spoken to so that foreign governments understand they can not use this country as a base for criminal action.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here