Despite the seriousness of the current power tussle between Westminster and Holyrood over powers returning to UK Parliaments after Brexit, it hasn’t been easy for the SNP to get people energised about it.
The issue often becomes bogged down in the language of bills, clauses, constitutions and courts. What the situation needed was a game changer; a gesture that would put it on the map in a way that people instinctively understand, and the SNP’s House of Commons walkout during Prime Minister’s Questions this week marked that turning point.
As a result, Scotland’s fears about Westminster gobbling up powers that Holyrood insists it should have control over began dominating UK news headlines. People stopped to pay attention, and if the surge in SNP membership in the following days was anything to go by, they didn’t like what they saw from the UK Government.
The challenge now for the SNP, as former leader Alex Salmond says in these pages today, is to maintain momentum. Salmond advocates a disruptive approach to Westminster politics, and reprimands MPs who, he says, have been more concerned with “winning the gold star for good attendance rather than independence”.
There is a sense that the tide is turning in favour of the SNP’s approach to Brexit. Indeed, Murray Foote, former editor of the Daily Record and an architect of the famous “vow” signed by UK party leaders just before the independence referendum pledging to give Scotland more power within the union, Murray Foote, this week declared himself now a supporter of Scottish independence.
After the recent publication of the Sustainable Growth Commission report on the economics of an independent Scotland, and now the rebellious mood of the SNP’s MPs, all eyes will now be on the polls to see if there is a substantial mood emerging in favour of Scottish independence.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here