A political party's health can be detected by the mood at conference and the number of delegates who turn up.
By that measure, the SNP is in fine fettle. The atmosphere at the SECC in Glasgow was upbeat, the number of delegates and visitors estimated at around 2000 and if any of them were not on message, they hid it very effectively. Smiley faces were all around.
Staff had to find four overflow areas for Alex Salmond's speech with queues starting to form two hours before he was due on stage. Nicola Sturgeon was repeatedly asked to have her photograph taken by members of the public visiting the venue for a separate event.
This is a settled and recognised leadership team. Contrast that to what has happened in the Scottish Labour, Tory and LibDem parties, all of which have had a change at the top since in recent months.
Mr Salmond, Ms Sturgeon and colleagues had announcements to make – though opposition parties rightly question how they square with previous unfulfilled pledges – and a visionary zeal.
Independence – a word not overly used at SNP conferences for some years – featured heavily.
With the local authority elections looming, the nationalists' main opposition, Labour, was target for its alleged negativity, though that same trait was just as evident in some of the accusations being levelled by the nationalists themselves. It was central to toughly worded attacks on Glasgow's Labour leadership and is the kind of propaganda which can blow back on the perpetrator.
Last year's conference was the launch pad for the SNP's remarkable performance in the Holyrood elections and activists left the conference believing it can be the same for the local government ballot.
The SNP is standing more candidates than ever before and the mood from this conference is a clear indication that there will be no lack of enthusiasm from the foot soldiers in spreading that message.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article