A limit should be placed on the taxpayer-funded legal support available to individuals criticised by the Iraq war inquiry to speed up the publication of the final report, a Conservative MP said.
David Davis, a leading critic of the failure to publish the conclusions of Sir John Chilcot's probe six years after it was commissioned, said the cost to the public was ridiculous.
Families of those who died in the controversial 2003 military action are preparing legal action over the failure to set any timetable for the release of the conclusions.
Sir John said this week that the last responses to the "Maxwellisation" process - a consultation of all those facing criticism - were due "shortly" but defied pressure to set a date.
The chairman said he understood the "anguish" of those who lost loved ones in the conflict but argued that the probe was "unprecedented" in its scope.
Crispin Blunt, who chairs the Commons foreign affairs select committee, has warned that setting a deadline could "wreck" the inquiry.
But fellow Conservative Mr Davis said curbing legal support could speed it up.
"There are two groups of people who are suffering most from these inordinate delays of Chilcot: one group are the families of the dead who are being denied closure and the other group are the ordinary taxpayers who are being denied an answer as to the causes of the war," he told The Daily Telegraph.
"It seems ridiculous that the second group - the taxpayers - are also having to pay the cost of this answer being delayed ad infinitum.
"Surely the reasonable action for the Government to take now is to say 'there should be a limit in time and money on what can be spent on government lawyers to allow this inordinate delay to continue'."
Downing Street said: "This is an independent inquiry and as such Maxwellisation, publication and timing are a matter for Sir John."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel