David Cameron has lashed out at Ken Livingstone after the former London mayor said British troops are "discredited" and Chinese forces should go into Syria.
Mr Livingstone, who has been put in joint charge of a review of Labour's defence policy, made the comments as he backed Jeremy Corbyn's opposition to air strikes against Islamic State (IS) in Syria.
Arguing that bombing could not work without boots on the ground, the ex-MP told LBC radio: "We cannot put British troops on the ground because they are too discredited after Iraq and Afghanistan.
"But we should look to countries like China. I think China would jump at the opportunity to be involved because it would bring them on to the global stage. They have got millions of troops."
Mr Livingstone also suggested that Labour's ruling National Executive Committee (NEC) - on which he sits - should have a role in deciding the parliamentary party's position on support for air strikes.
"That would be the case for Labour's National Executive, which is the body that oversees the party, not the PLP," he said.
There have been demands for Mr Livingstone to be removed from the party's defence policy review - which he co-convenes with shadow defence secretary Maria Eagle - after he said shadow defence minister Kevan Jones needed "psychiatric help".
Many moderates believe Mr Livingstone - a close ally of Mr Corbyn - has been put in the role because he shares the leader's desire to scrap the Trident nuclear weapons system.
Speaking at a press conference at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (Chogm) in Malta, Mr Cameron said: "I have the highest possible regard for the British Armed Forces.
"The person who frankly seems to be letting himself down is Ken Livingstone with the remarks that he makes."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here