A Labour councillor embroiled in a nepotism row has pulled out of the race to become a party candidate for Holyrood.
Yvonne Kucuk, who has faced scrutiny over the number of relatives linked to a community centre she helps run, has not applied to be on the Glasgow Shettleston shortlist.
Kucuk, who represents the Calton ward on Glasgow city council, had been the favourite in the internal contest after Frank McAveety relinquished the candidacy due to becoming council leader again.
However, senior party figures were said to be unenthusiastic about her winning the selection and re-opened the applications process.
Scottish Labour headquarters stated that the original shortlist did not “reflect the aspirations” of the party in respect of diversity.
Kucuk was then at the centre of a storm over a Commonwealth Games legacy project she helped deliver in the Dalmarnock area of Glasgow.
BACKGROUND: THE 'NEPOTISM' ROW
The new centre – which houses health and recreational facilities and was funded by £3.5million of public money and run by the People’s Development Trust, which employs Kucuk as a “regeneration” manager.
Picture: Kucuk (second from right) open the Dalmarnock Legacy Hub
However, she faced questions earlier this month over the number of relatives linked to the Trust and the legacy Hub.
Her cousin Alan Kennedy was appointed to the Trust board in 2011 for three years and his son Robert joined in 2014.
Kucuk’s husband works at the legacy hub and Labour councillor Maureen Burke is employed by the Trust.
It emerged last week that Kucuk was not now in the running to be a Holyrood candidate.
A party spokesperson said: "She's not on the shortlist of candidates for Shettleston. Party members will decide the candidate in early December."
SNP MSP John Mason said: “I’m not surprised. If Labour are now being more careful about who they select as candidates, I would welcome that.”
Kucuk did not respond to a request for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel