Cabinet minister John Whittingdale has indicated he stands ready to campaign for Britain to quit the European Union.
The Culture Secretary pointed to his track record of being "highly critical" of the way the 28-strong bloc is run as he refused to rule out backing a Brexit.
It comes as David Cameron faces further pressure to produce measures aimed at boosting the powers of Westminster over Brussels amid continued criticism from Europsceptic Tories about the reform proposals unveiled on Tuesday.
Mr Whittingdale told The House magazine: "My position is that the Prime Minister is out there trying to negotiate the best deal he can for the country. I have a track record where I've been highly critical of the way the EU works and I have opposed measures for closer integration and it certainly needs reform.
"I hope the Prime Minister will get that agreement and then I'll look at it when he comes back with it."
Asked if he would rule out backing Brexit, he replied: "I wouldn't."
Critics claimed the proposed emergency brake on benefits is "highly unlikely" to stop EU migrants heading to Britain after records showed "quite low" numbers claimed tax credits.
Some 84,000 EU migrant households who arrived in the UK or been issued a National Insurance number during the previous four years received the benefit in 2013/14, according to HM Revenue and Customs.
Figures released under Freedom of Information laws showed that 50,000 were claims from couples and 34,000 were single claims.
Proposals for reforming Britain's relationship with Brussels include an emergency brake to restrict benefits for migrant workers, with benefits phased in over the four-year period.
Jonathan Portes, principal research fellow at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, said: "This new data shows that the Prime Minister's claim that 40% of recently arrived European migrants were dependent on benefits was at best selective and misleading.
"Given that well over a million European migrants registered for National Insurance numbers over the period in question (and far more since) this suggests that claim rates among newly arrived migrants are, as researchers have always argued, quite low.
"Once again this suggests that the PM's focus on this issue is misguided - the 'emergency brake' will have only a modest impact on benefit receipt, and is highly unlikely to have a significant impact on migration flows.
"This latest data still leaves some important questions unanswered. In particular, the Government is still refusing to tell us - for obvious political reasons - how many recent European migrants are recorded as being active in the UK labour market."
The emergency brake proposals and plans for a "red card" allowing parliaments to block laws from Brussels have been further ridiculed by Eurosceptic Tories, with claims they are a "desperate attempt to put lipstick on a pig".
Mr Cameron has been meeting key players from the EU in London, holding talks with European Council president Donald Tusk, Slovak PM Robert Fico, Greek PM Alexis Tsipras, Swedish PM Stefan Lofven and Belgian PM Charles Michel, in the margins of the Syria donors' conference.
Number 10 said leaders had agreed to "continue working together" to find "solutions" during the intense round of talks.
Downing Street said the Prime Minister will meet with the heads of the political groups in the European Parliament before the crunch meeting of EU leaders to discuss the reform proposals later this month.
After discussions in Downing Street, European Parliament president Martin Schulz said a "compromise" could be found.
Speaking outside Number 10, he said: "I think there is enough good will for a compromise and still a lot of things to discuss.
"But in the end I think we will find a compromise to which UK citizens can vote to stay in the European Union."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel