MPs have rejected Mike Ashley's request to visit the head office of his retail chain Sports Direct as a condition for being quizzed in Parliament.
Mr Ashley has been summoned to the Palace of Westminster on June 7 regarding a forthcoming evidence session from the Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) Committee on working practices at Sports Direct, but he said he would only attend the meeting if politicians visit his retail firm's offices in Shirebrook, Derbyshire the day before.
In its letter, the BIS Committee confirms it will not undertake a visit to Shirebrook in advance of the evidence session on 7 June.
Iain Wright MP, chair of the (BIS) Committee said: “Business leaders regularly give evidence to Select Committees in Westminster without imposing conditions.
"This is part and parcel of living and operating a business in a parliamentary democracy.
"It is highly unusual for select committees to have to resort to issuing a summons.
"The Business Committee has a number of questions it wishes to ask Mr Ashley on the public record about the treatment of workers at Sports Direct and about the scope, progress, and timetable of the review of working practices which Mr Ashley announced in December.
"In March, Mr Ashley received a summons to give evidence on 7 June.
"He has stated in his letter to me that he is available on that date and the committee expects Mr Ashley to attend without conditions being imposed.”
The Committee is set to hear from representatives of the Unite union - Luke Primarolo, Regional Officer, and Steve Turner, Assistant General Secretary - as part of its inquiry into working practices at Sports Direct.
MPs have been trying to get the Newcastle United owner to appear at Parliament for months and the Committee issued a summons for Mr Ashley to attend a hearing in June after he was previously absent when summoned in March.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel