THE UK Government has been urged to reverse its "inhumane" decision to close a dedicated immigration family unit and give reassurances that the child detention facility at Dungavel near Glasgow will not be reopened.
The call to Amber Rudd, the home secretary, has been made by Alistair Carmichael, the former Scottish secretary and home affairs spokesman for the Liberal Democrats, who described the Government’s decision to close the Barnado’s-run Cedars Unit near Gatwick Airport as a “huge step backwards”.
The SNP also expressed alarm at the move, which it denounced as “disgraceful,” and a sign that the Conservative Government had reneged on its pledge to end child detention.
Read more: Scotland 'on the brink of independence' says SNP's Westminster leader Angus Robertson
Earlier this week, on the last day of sitting before the Commons went into its summer recess, Robert Goodwill, the home office minister, announced the closure of the Cedars unit and its replacement by a new “pre-departure accommodation unit” near Gatwick Airport at the Tinsley House immigration removal centre.
In a written statement, he said that, following a review, while it was recognised that the Cedars unit was an exceptional facility, it accepted on “value for money grounds” that it should be closed.
The minister emphasised that the Government had met its commitment to “end the routine detention of children for immigration purposes” by fundamentally changing the way in which it dealt with families, who had no lawful basis to stay in the UK and limiting the detention of unaccompanied children for removal.
Mr Goodwill added: “The Government is committed to safeguarding the health and wellbeing of those detained in its care, some of whom may be vulnerable. It is very grateful to Barnardo’s for all its valuable work with families at Cedars and for working with us to ensuring that the new facility continues to safeguard and promote the welfare of children and builds on the learning and experience of Cedars.”
Read more: Women who breastfeed in House of Commons are exhibitionists, DUP East Antrim MP Sammy Wilson claims
Mr Carmichael pointed out how one of the first things his party did during the Coalition Government was to force Theresa May, the then home secretary, to end the detention of immigrant children. “Days after coming to power, she has thrown away years of progress,” he declared.
The Orkney and Shetland MP went on: “What this decision means in practice is a return to a situation where young children will find themselves in detention centres surrounded by razor wire and guards. This is a huge step backwards.”
Tinsley House is a secure detention centre surrounded by a chain-link fence, run by G4S, and has been described as resembling a prison.
“Previously, we had seen some children locked up at Dungavel for more than a year and there were damning reports on the level of educational support provided to children at the site. The last thing we need is a return to a situation where young people in the immigration system are treated like cattle, not children,” said Mr Carmichael.
Read more: Scotland 'on the brink of independence' says SNP's Westminster leader Angus Robertson
He added: “The Prime Minister needs to scrap her plans to close Cedars and we need urgent assurances that this inhumane decision will not open the door to a return to child detention at Dungavel.”
SNP MSP Sandra White is equally concerned and said moving children to the “prison-style Tinsley House” was a regressive and callous move.
“I urge the UK Government to reconsider its policy, to end child detention and to start treating people of all ages with the dignity and respect that they deserve. There is no place for prison-style facilities like Tinsley House or Dungavel in our society and it is clear that they help no one,” she added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here