Did it all start with a Glasgow kiss?
The volatility in British politics that has left much of the nation bedazzled and bamboozled by the sheer speed and scale of change might have had its origins in a Commons bar sometime after 10pm on February 22 2012.
This was when Eric Joyce, the former MP for Falkirk, decided to lash out after having one too many.
Read more: MP Eric Joyce fined and put under curfew after admitting four assaults
Declaring in the popular Strangers’ Bar: "There are too many f****** Tories in here!" he subsequently headbutted the mildly-mannered Conservative member for Pudsey in West Yorkshire, Stuart Andrew.
Apart from the fact this was the beginning of the end for Mr Joyce’s political career, it also led to a process in which Labour had to find a new candidate for the Falkirk constituency for the 2016 General Election.
This, of course, itself led onto an almighty row between Ed Miliband’s Labour Party and Unite with allegations made that the trade union, which just happens to be Labour’s biggest donor, was trying to “stitch up” the selection process; an allegation it strongly denied.
Nonetheless, the claims of entryism led onto Mr Miliband’s (in)famous decision to seek to change the rules on how the leader was elected.
In March 2014, a special conference changed the rules; out went the old electoral college in which parliamentarians, trade unionists and party members each had one third of the vote and in came one person one vote.
But crucially and in a bid to open up the process to a wider audience and “let people back into politics”, Mr Miliband promoted the move to enable Labour supporters to take part in a future leadership election. The cost was the price of a cup of coffee; just £3.
Read more: Ex-SNP leader Gordon Wilson warns against push for early independence referendum
This, of course, following Labour’s defeat in 2015 led to Jeremy Corbyn being elected the party’s new leader. While the Islington MP got just under 50 per cent support from Labour members and 58 per cent support from trade unionists, the backing from those registered supporters was a stonking 84 per cent.
Yet since winning the Labour crown 10 months ago, the party has been embroiled in an unsightly civil war; so much so that Mr Corbyn, on the back of a wave of shadow cabinet resignations, cannot fill his frontline at Westminster.
But the Labour collapse in the run-up to the EU referendum led to charges Mr Corbyn, who for most of his career has been an Outer, had been absent from the frontline as an Inner; that in those Labour heartlands of northern England and the Midlands were the Leave vote was strongest, he had failed to put the work in to save Britain’s membership of the EU.
The EU result has unleashed a political whirlwind, including the departure of David Cameron from and the arrival of Theresa May to No 10.
It has also breathed life into another political giant: Scottish independence.
While the UK as a whole voted for Brexit, Scotland voted for Remain, so we now have the governments in London and Edinburgh facing in completely opposite directions; not for the first time.
Read more: No place for abuse in the Labour Party insists Jeremy Corbyn
The PM insists Brexit means Brexit while the FM declares, for Scotland, Remain means Remain. No 10 has made clear Mrs May believes the idea of Scotland remaining in the EU while the UK exits it, is “impracticable”.
So the political forces, unleashed by the butterfly effect four years ago in a Commons bar, have not ended yet. Some might think Mr Joyce has a lot to answer for. Others might raise a glass to him.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel