THE UK Government has been forced to hand over legal documents detailing why it is refusing to let MPs have a vote to decide when and how Britain should leave the European Union.
High Court judge Mr Justice Cranston made the decision ahead of a crunch hearing next month brought by “concerned citizens,” including the People’s Challenge group, who claim Theresa May should not be able to enact Article 50 without Westminster’s approval.
The legal challenge has been described as the most important constitutional law case in living memory.
Read more: Still Game to return to Hydro with new live show in 2017
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, who wants the Scottish Parliament also to have a vote on the UK’s Brexit proposal, is keeping a “close eye” on the legal case but suggested the matter of whether or not MPs and MSPs should have a vote “probably will end up in the Supreme Court,” the UK’s final arbiter on important constitutional matters.
Attorney General Jeremy Wright, for the Government, said: “The country voted to leave the European Union in a referendum approved by Act of Parliament. We do not believe this case has legal merit.
In released documents, lawyers for Brexit Secretary David Davis insisted it was “crystal clear” that the UK Government had the power to enact withdrawal.
Read more: Still Game to return to Hydro with new live show in 2017
Meanwhile, Labour’s shadow foreign secretary Emily Thornberry yesterday said Scotland should not get a separate deal on Brexit.
She said: “It was a UK referendum... we have to negotiate as the UK and get the best result for the UK.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel