Zac Goldsmith has quit as a Conservative MP and will stand as an independent in the by-election he has triggered in protest over Heathrow expansion.
The failed London mayoral candidate said the decision to push ahead with a third runway was "catastrophic".
Mr Goldsmith, a high-profile environmentalist whose Richmond Park and North Kingston constituency lies under the Heathrow flight path, has long threatened to resign if the Government backed the expansion plan.
Constituents feel "let down" down that the promises made by the Tories under David Cameron had not been kept, he said.
Mr Goldsmith insisted the fight to stop expansion was not over and insisted the by-election would be a "chance to send a message to government".
He said: "I promised you if my party won the election, the third runway would be scrapped. And I wasn't making it up.
"My party leader - the then leader of the Opposition - made that same promise directly to us. He came here and told us: 'No ifs, no buts, there will be no third runway'.
"It was music to our ears. But not everyone believed him, because people assume the worst in politicians. So I followed his promise with my own. I told you that if my party changed its position, I would trigger a by-election and give you a chance to vote again.
"There was no small print. No expiry date. No ambiguity. It was a simple promise. And it mattered. I know it mattered, because the thought of Heathrow expansion fills most of my constituents with dread.
"That's why my party's promise mattered. It's why my promise mattered. And it's why so many people in our community feel so let down today."
Mr Goldsmith said the Government had chosen the "most polluting, most disruptive, most expensive option" but it was "also chosen the option with the least chance of being delivered".
"The sheer complexity, cost and legal difficulties mean it is unlikely ever to happen," he said. "It will be a millstone round this Government's neck for years."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article