A high-profile Conservative dramatically quit as the decision to build a third runway at Heathrow opened up another damaging rift within the Tory party.
Just a year after he was the Conservative candidate to become London mayor, Zac Goldsmith resigned as an MP in protest at his government’s choice.
The move triggers a by-election in his seat of Richmond Park, in which Mr Goldsmith is expected to stand on an anti-Heathrow ticket.
Mr Goldsmith warned that the decision would be a “millstone” around the government’s neck and declared the plan “undeliverable”.
That word were echoed by the Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson.
Both he and the Education Secretary, Justine Greening, who described the decision as “extremely disappointing”, have been given an unusual dispensation to attack the plan.
Normally cabinet members are bound by the convention of collective responsibility.
But Prime Minister Theresa May has decided to 'relax' the rule in a bid to prevent more resignations.
Mr Johnson predicted that the Heathrow decision, the biggest yet taken by Mrs May's government, is likely to be stopped.
The Foreign Secretary said the project would cause "inevitable degradation" to the quality of life of people under the potential new flight paths.
He added: "A third runway is undeliverable.
"The day when the bulldozers appear is a long way off, if indeed they ever materialise."
His own plan, for a new airport in the Thames Estuary, dubbed 'Boris Island', was a "better solution", he said.
He added: "No other great city would do this to its inhabitants. New York is going to be the city of beautiful skyscrapers, Paris the city of lights and London in the future, if we go ahead with this project, will be known as the city of planes."
Mr Johnson anticipated the proposal would be "snarled up" in legal cases.
"I think it very likely it will be stopped," he said.
"We have been here before and we are going to see an inevitable fight in the courts and I think the chances of success for the proponents of the third runway are not high."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel