John Bercow has steered clear of a request to apologise to MPs for "unilaterally seeking to ban" Donald Trump from addressing Parliament.
Conservative Andrew Bridgen said the Speaker was right to apologise to his counterpart in the Lords for his actions and asked when an apology will follow in the Commons.
Mr Bercow said he had dealt with the matter "very fully" a fortnight ago when replying to questions from MPs on the issue, noting: "We shall leave it there."
He also said no approaches have been made by the Government nor the Backbench Business Committee, which arranges debates led by backbench MPs, to allocate time for a parliamentary debate about his future as Speaker.
Five MPs - including Mr Bridgen - have signed a motion of no confidence in Mr Bercow.
It was tabled after the Speaker made controversial comments about the US president and Brexit.
These included Mr Bercow telling MPs he was effectively banning Mr Trump from addressing MPs and peers in Westminster Hall during his impending state visit.
Raising a point of order, Mr Bridgen (North West Leicestershire) told Mr Bercow: "You quite rightly apologised to the Lord Speaker for unilaterally seeking to ban the president of the United States from Westminster Hall.
"It was quite right to do that. When can we expect an apology in this chamber?"
Mr Bercow replied: "I'm grateful to you for what you have said.
"I treated of that matter very fully, both on the day in question when I responded to (Stephen Doughty, Labour MP for Cardiff South and Penarth) and the following day, when there were points of order.
"I can't recall whether you were in your place at that time, but I responded to points of order. The matter was addressed fully and we shall leave it there."
Conservative former minister James Duddridge, who tabled the no confidence motion, earlier asked Mr Bercow: "Notwithstanding the underwhelming support for my vote of no confidence in you, has the Government or indeed the Backbench Business Committee contacted you in any way to allocate time for this unresolved matter to be debated and indeed voted on?"
Mr Bercow replied: "The short answer is no and there is absolutely no reason why they should have done, a point I can say from my own head and heart - fortified in the knowledge that it is also the sound advice of the experienced clerk of the House, who has been working in the service of the House for 40 years."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel