THE Scottish Conservatives are struggling to fill a vacancy for a new MSP after becoming a victim of their own success at the general election.
So many people have been elected from the party's North East list for Holyrood that it is now down to a single option - but he is needed to keep the Tories in power on Aberdeen City Council.
The party put forward ten names for last year’s Scottish election, half of whom were elected - Alexander Burnett became MSP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine, while Alex Johnstone, Ross Thomson, Peter Chapman and Liam Kerr became regional MSPs.
After Mr Johnstone died in December, he was replaced by the sixth-placed Bill Bowman.
On Thursday, Mr Thomson was elected MP for Aberdeen South, creating another list vacancy.
However the seventh place candidate, Nicola Ross, effectively disqualified herself by standing against the Tories in May’s local election as an Independent in Edinburgh.
Meanwhile the eighth and ninth place candidates - Colin Clark and Kirstene Hair - were elected as MPs in Gordon and Angus respectively, taking them out of contention.
That leaves Tom Mason as the tenth and final option on the North East list.
However Mr Mason is depute Provost in Aberdeen, where the Tories and Independents have 23 of the 45 seats, and if he quit to become an MSP, the Tories could lose the resulting by-election and hence power in the city.
A Scottish Tory spokesman said: “We are currently confirming who will take up the places on the Highlands and North East lists that have been vacated, and will be following due process.”
The situation is simpler in the Highlands & Islands, where the election of MSP Douglas Ross as MP for Moray means Jamie Halcro Johnston is expected to replace him at Holyrood.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel