Proposals for sweeping reforms of the Scottish Parliament would promote "trust" in Holyrood, Presiding Officer Ken Macintosh has said.
The Commission on Parliamentary Reform recommended an overhaul of the committee system but stopped short of calling for a second chamber or more MSPs.
The commission said that while Holyrood was generally well-regarded, changes would result in "significant improvements" in its effectiveness and ability to act as "a more successful and stronger force for good".
Read more: Independence referendum plans statement 'likely' before Holyrood recess
Mr Macintosh asked commission chairman John McCormick to draw up recommendations for reform after questions were raised about how effective Parliament committees are at scrutinising Scottish Government legislation.
It also comes at a time when MSPs are taking on new powers over income tax and welfare.
Among the 75 recommendations is a call for smaller and stronger committees with conveners not nominated by party whips but elected by Parliament, which the commission's report said would "emphasise the independence of committees and give conveners a mandate for pursuing their scrutiny agenda".
A committee engagement unit should be created to support committees in innovation and risk-taking and committee membership should reflect Parliament's gender balance.
Holyrood should replace the current three-stage legislative process with a five-stage process including pre-legislative and post-legislative scrutiny, allow committees and chamber to meet at the same time, scrap the "pointless" scripted diary questions party leaders open First Minister's Questions with and no longer require advance publication of chosen questions.
Other recommendations include the parliament working with political parties and others to agree benchmarks for diversity in Holyrood election candidates.
A further recommendation is to create a working group to examine the case for increasing resources, such as pay and staffing, for MSPs who take on extra roles, such as committee convener, and for party leaders.
The commission, which heard from more than 1,200 people including former first ministers, also recommends establishing a legislative standards body.
Amid some calls for the number of MSPs to be increased, the report did not rule out any options but concluded "all the options to maximise the capacity of the existing Parliament must be tried before more radical proposals are considered".
Mr Macintosh accepted the recommendations and said: "The long-term gain is that it will promote trust in the Scottish Parliament and in parliamentarians generally in the eyes of the Scottish people so that they can have confidence in the Scottish Parliament.
"They can believe in this institution as somewhere to be trusted, that's carrying out its work effectively on behalf of all the people of Scotland."
The report does not contain costs for the reforms but Mr Macintosh said it is "not an expensive wishlist" and Mr McCormick said the extra cost would not be "significant".
"Taken as a package, these 75 recommendations will bring significant change to the parliament and, we believe, deliver a more strong parliament and certainly a more effective parliament," Mr McCormick added.
Chair of the Commission on Parliamentary Reform John McCormick (PA)
Labour's Johann Lamont, who served on the commission, said the reforms would strengthen the Parliament's ability to scrutinise the government.
She said: "This report is an important step forward in ensuring the Scottish Parliament continues to serve the people of Scotland effectively.
Read more: Independence referendum plans statement 'likely' before Holyrood recess
"Bluntly, parliamentary business has not always accurately reflected the concerns, interests and priorities of the Scottish people.
"As new powers come to Holyrood, the Parliament must have the tools and the flexibility to hold the Scottish Government of the day to account."
SNP group convener Bruce Crawford said: "This report makes a number of interesting recommendations which members will wish to give careful consideration to.
"It's absolutely right that the Scottish Parliament takes stock, periodically reviews how it works and considers ways to improve those processes.
"We look forward to discussing and debating these recommendations further and deciding, as a parliament, how best to take them forward."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here