The UK's "divorce bill" on leaving the European Union should be no more than £26 billion (30 billion euro), a free-market think tank has calculated.
European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker has said the Brexit financial settlement could see the UK billed for around £50 billion, while unconfirmed reports have suggested EU officials believe the total could reach as much as £100 billion.
The sums cover commitments to EU budgets made during the UK's membership, along with liabilities for financial burdens such as ongoing pension payments for EU officials.
But Institute for Economic Affairs (IEA) chief economist Julian Jessop - head of the think tank's Brexit Unit, which launched on Monday - said that the "upper limit" for any payment should be £21 billion for liabilities under the EU's multi-year budget stretching up to 2020, along with around £5 billion for pensions and other one-off items.
"The Brexit negotiations will need to decide how much the UK will pay the EU to settle financial obligations undertaken while it was a member," said Mr Jessop.
Many Brits would suggest that the right figure is in the ballpark of zero. However, some EU officials have suggested the bill should be north of 100 billion euros.
"A compromise towards the lower end of this range might be acceptable - a figure of around £26 billion could be justified using certain principles. But if the two sides fail to agree a good deal on the terms of any future relationship, the UK can, and should, walk away without paying a penny."
The IEA said that a good outcome to negotiations underway between Brexit Secretary David Davis and EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier would provide "a golden opportunity to create a more flexible, open and vibrant economy and to champion by example the benefits of free trade around the world".
But it warned: "A positive outcome is not guaranteed. Negotiations are ongoing and a 'good deal' is far from certain; Brexit could end up resulting in more bureaucracy and state intervention, rather than less."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel