BRITAIN has set out its proposals to ensure that the trade in goods and services can continue with Europe after the point at which the UK leaves the European Union.
A position paper published by Brexit Secretary David Davis called for goods already on the market to be allowed to remain on sale in the UK and EU without additional requirements or restrictions following Brexit.
And it said any agreement should allow oversight arrangements to remain in place, permitting action to be taken against unsafe or non-compliant goods to preserve patient safety and consumer protection.
A second paper recommended a reciprocal agreement to ensure continued confidentiality for official documents shared by Britain with its EU partners while it was a member state.
The publications come ahead of the third round of formal Brexit talks in Brussels next week and are due to be followed in the coming days by papers setting out the UK's position on civil judicial co-operation, enforcement and dispute resolution and data protection.
Mr Davis said: "These papers will help give businesses and consumers certainty and confidence in the UK's status as an economic powerhouse after we have left the EU.
"They also show that as we enter the third round of negotiations, it is clear that our separation from the EU and future relationship are inextricably linked.
"We have already begun to set out what we would like to see from a future relationship on issues such as customs and are ready to begin a formal dialogue on this and other issues."
Responding to the Government’s paper on goods, John Foster, CBI Director of Campaigns said this was a “significant improvement” on the EU’s current proposal, whose narrow definition, he said, would create a severe cliff-edge hitting consumers on both sides of the Channel.
“However, the only way to provide companies with the reassurance they need is through the urgent agreement of interim arrangements,” declared Mr Foster.
“This would ensure that goods and services can still flow freely giving companies the certainty they need to invest. The simplest way to achieve that is for the UK to stay in the single market and a customs union until a comprehensive new deal is in force.
“Both sides should agree to move talks on to interim arrangements as soon as possible to stem the loss of investment,” he added.
Later this week, the Government is due to publish a so-called future partnership paper on civil judicial co-operation and how rights will be protected once Britain is no longer under the jurisdiction of the European courts.
Publication of the papers comes after an EU leader warned that slow progress in Brexit talks meant the UK would not be able to progress to the second phase of negotiations in October as planned.
Leaders of the other 27 EU member states are due to decide then whether or not "sufficient progress" has been made on the UK's divorce deal for negotiations to move on to the post-Brexit trading relationship between Britain and its former partners.
Miro Cerar, the Slovenian Prime Minister, told the Guardian: "The process will definitely take more time than we expected at the start of the negotiations.
"There are so many difficult topics on the table, difficult issues there, that one cannot expect all those issues will be solved according to the schedule made in the first place."
But a Downing Street spokeswoman said: "We are confident that we will have made sufficient progress by October to be able to advance talks to the next phase.
"That is our aim and we are confident that we are working at a pace to be able to get to that point."
Meanwhile, Crawford Falconer, the Government's new chief trade negotiation adviser, said the trade deals Britain could strike after Brexit would help boost global security.
Last week, the Government conceded that the UK would not be able to implement any new free trade agreements under a proposed customs transition deal expected to expire around two years after Brexit in March 2019.
But Professor Falconer, who will work alongside International Trade Secretary Liam Fox from this week, argued: "There is a powerful political and security element to getting this right.
"History is littered with instances of the destructive political consequences of closed markets. This was a lesson well understood at the end of the last century's global conflicts."
He added: "Many countries still recognise that open trade policies directed at engaging with others are at the core of any strategy to improve the global prospects for political openness and stability. They are already looking to partner with us to re-energise that agenda."
A New Zealand/UK dual national with more than 25 years' experience, Prof Falconer will lead trade policy and the development of negotiation capability and will serve as an ambassador for Dr Fox's Department for International Trade.
A former senior official in New Zealand's foreign office and judge in international trade disputes, as well as a professor of trade at the Commonwealth country's Lincoln University, he was offered the post of Chief Trade Negotiation Adviser and Second Permanent Secretary following a global recruitment exercise.
Prof Falconer said: "As the UK prepares to leave the EU, we have a huge opportunity to be a world innovator, striking trade deals outside of Europe, and to be an ambassador for free trade across the world.
"With 90 per cent of new trade to coming from outside the EU in the next decades, this is an immensely exciting time to join the department, and I look forward to preparing for the important negotiations ahead," he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel