Sinn Fein and the DUP have expressed a desire to restore powersharing in Northern Ireland but neither has signalled a softening of position in the Stormont standoff.
Democratic Unionist leader Arlene Foster and Sinn Fein’s Stormont leader Michelle O’Neill used new year messages to reiterate their preference for devolved governance instead of a return to Westminster direct rule.
But they also made clear their stances on key sticking points in the long-running powersharing crisis had not changed.
It is almost a year since Northern Ireland had a properly functioning administration. The institutions collapsed last January amid a row over a botched green energy scheme.
The rift between the DUP and Sinn Fein widened in the subsequent months.
A standoff over proposed legislative protections for Irish language speakers and the region’s ban on same-sex marriage are currently among the main sticking points.
Mrs Foster said the UK Government should move promptly to appoint direct rule ministers if a short final attempt at brokering a deal fails.
She said a short time frame should be set for renewed negotiations and rejected suggestions that the talks venue should be shifted to a hothouse format in England.
The former Stormont first minister said the continued absence of a devolved executive was “unacceptable and simply unsustainable”.
“Recent rounds of talks have been bedevilled by the setting of pre-conditions by Sinn Fein,” Mrs Foster claimed.
“Let us re-enter talks with one shared pre-condition – that we will redouble our efforts to restore devolution and start taking the decisions that the people of Northern Ireland so desperately need.
“Let’s set ourselves a short time frame. And let’s do it here at home rather than in some fancy English stately home.”
Mrs O’Neill made clear Sinn Fein would only return to Stormont if the DUP was prepared to give ground on issues such as the Irish language and gay marriage.
“I want to lead Sinn Fein back into a new Executive because locally elected ministers are best placed to run local public services and fight back against the threats of Brexit and austerity,” she said.
“I believe that can happen early in the new year but only if the institutions represent genuine and equal partnership government for all our people.
“That will require the British Government and the DUP accepting the political and democratic reality which has already been made abundantly clear by the electorate.”
Mrs Foster said: “I still believe that the best way to deal with the issues facing our society is for Stormont to be back up and running with locally elected and accountable politicians taking decisions on the issues that matter to people across our province.
“A return to direct rule would be an inferior alternative, but it would be a government.”
“But the people of Northern Ireland deserve a government and if Sinn Fein persist with their intransigence then the Secretary of State (James Brokenshire) should move to appoint direct rule ministers early in the new year.”
Mrs O’Neill said she was “optimistic” that powersharing could be put back together: “I am optimistic because I see the transformation that has taken place in this society since the people voted for the Good Friday Agreement 20 years ago.”
SDLP leader Colum Eastwood insisted direct rule was not inevitable.
He accused Sinn Fein and the DUP of overseeing 10 years of failed governance.
“British direct rule can’t, like Brexit, be enforced upon us,” he said. “Whether from a nationalist or unionist tradition, each and every one of us belongs to this small corner of Ireland.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel