A Brexit minister has avoided being sacked but was forced into a Commons apology for raising allegations which suggested Treasury officials were trying to keep Britain in the customs union.
Steve Baker said he should have corrected or dismissed an account of the claim relayed to the Commons by Conservative MP Jacob Rees-Mogg, which he initially described as "essentially correct" and "extraordinary".
He appeared in the Commons at the start of business on Friday to correct the record and apologise, hours after Prime Minister Theresa May insisted she would not sack him from his ministerial role.
The storm erupted after leading Brexiteer Mr Rees-Mogg asked the minister to confirm if he had heard from Charles Grant, of the Centre for European Reform think tank, that "officials in the Treasury have deliberately developed a model to show that all options other than staying in the customs union were bad and that officials intended to use this to influence policy".
Mr Grant strongly denied the claim and Mr Baker later had to backtrack when audio recordings showed his recollection was inaccurate.
Raising a point of order, Mr Baker told the Commons: "In the context of that audio, I accept I should have corrected or dismissed the premise of my honourable friend's question.
"I have apologised to Mr Charles Grant, who is an honest and trustworthy man.
"As I've put on record many times, I have the highest regard for our hard-working civil servants.
"I'm grateful for this early opportunity to correct the record and I apologise to the House."
Questioned on the row during her visit to China, Mrs May insisted that civil servants and ministers were "working together" to deliver the best possible Brexit.
Asked by Channel 5 News whether she would sack Mr Baker, the Prime Minister replied: "No. The ministerial code says that the minister should take the earliest opportunity to amend the record that he has given to Parliament and apologise to Parliament. He will do that.
"What I understand the minister did was to reflect what he thought somebody else had said at a meeting. He has now recalled that was not right, he is going to apologise, he is going to ensure that the record in Hansard is correct so that Parliament is not misled when that record is read in the future.
"That's what the ministerial code asks him to do and that is what he will be doing."
Downing Street had initially said there was no reason to question Mr Baker's version of events, before adding he had made a "genuine mistake" after the tape was released by Prospect magazine.
Mr Baker's initial claims had provoked a furious backlash from the union representing senior civil servants, which accused him of being irresponsible and "cowardly" for failing to challenge the "conspiracy theory".
The controversy comes hot on the heels of Mr Baker drawing fire earlier in the week for dismissing Whitehall forecasts as "always wrong".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel