A sharp fall in EU migration should be a “red line” for the UK in Brexit trade negotiations, according to a campaign group.
Migration Watch UK argues in a new report that the Government must firmly oppose any attempt to seek concessions on immigration as part of the talks.
The paper says it is normal in trade agreements to allow the movement of staff essential for facilitating the flow of goods and services.
But, according to the report, the EU has not previously insisted upon “liberalised” border regimes or freedom of movement as a condition of a trade agreement.
It concludes: “If they were to do so in the negotiations that are pending with the UK it would clearly be driven by political, rather than economic, considerations.
“The UK Government must maintain distinct separation between its trade negotiations and establishing a post-Brexit immigration policy.”
Lord Green of Deddington, chairman of Migration Watch UK, said: “A sharp reduction in immigration from the EU must be a red line in these negotiations, not a bargaining chip.
“The Government has already caved in on rights for those arriving in the implementation period.
“They must not capitulate on longer term immigration arrangements.
“That would be a betrayal of the 17 million who voted for Brexit.”
Official figures have shown falls in net migration from the EU since the referendum.
An estimated 90,000 more long-term EU migrants arrived in Britain than left in the 12 months to September 2017.
It was the first time net migration from the bloc had dipped below 100,00 since the year to March 2013, and the lowest figure recorded since 2012.
A Government spokesman said: “The Prime Minister has been clear that free movement will end and we will retake control of the UK’s borders.
“After we have left the EU, we will put in place an immigration system that works for the whole of the UK.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here