Two Tory former Scottish secretaries have criticised the SNP for turning every issue into a "grievance" and "constitutional crisis" amid fears the party will block Brexit legislation.
Lord Lang of Monkton said the SNP "would make a grievance out of a ray of sunshine" and that every other issue was subservient to independence.
His successor as Scottish secretary, Lord Forsyth of Drumlean, also said the SNP "are determined to destroy and break up the United Kingdom".
READ MORE: Court battle looms as Holyrood passes alternative Brexit Bill
Their comments came as peers scrutinised how devolved powers will be treated in the flagship European Union (Withdrawal) Bill.
Lord Lang said of the Scottish government: "They're working to a different agenda. An agenda with only one item on it, and that item is independence.
"Everything in every area of government in Scotland is subservient to that. Hence the neglect that we see of education, the economy and all the other matters that are their responsibility.
"If they can find a way of turning everything that happens into a source of grievance, they will do so. Grievance is their default position.
"They would make a grievance out of a ray of sunshine, if they thought it would help their cause."
The objections from the Welsh government to Clause 11 of the Bill were not as strong as those in Scotland, said Lord Lang.
"We're blinding ourselves to reality if we don't take account of the fact that the Scottish administration has a completely different agenda from this one," he added.
Lord Forsyth said: "The difficulty we have here in Scotland is that we have the party in power who are determined to destroy and break up the United Kingdom.
"That is their agenda, and as my friend Lord Lang said, every single issue is turned into a constitutional crisis and is a source of dispute."
He went on to say he doubted the Scottish government "will want to do anything other than continue this dispute", as he urged UK ministers to "get on with it" as they had already gone as far as any reasonable person could expect them to go.
"If we have a situation where one devolved legislature is able to have a requirement for consent as opposed to being consulted, then we have one part of the United Kingdom able to use its veto to subvert the wider interests of the United Kingdom, and that was never, ever part of the devolution settlement," said Lord Forsyth.
READ MORE: Court battle looms as Holyrood passes alternative Brexit Bill
Conservative Lord Mackay of Clashfern, a former lord chancellor, has tabled an amendment to the Bill.
It calls for a joint committee from the UK Government and devolved administrations to decide which devolved areas to include in UK-wide frameworks, on the basis they must relate to maintaining the UK single market.
While the amendment proved broadly popular, Lord Forsyth said such a measure would "change and alter our constitution".
He added: "As I look at the amendment, I think 'who will speak for England'?
"The Secretary of State's responsibilities are for the whole of the United Kingdom, not for England."
Lord Forsyth also said Tony Blair regretted introducing devolution in Scotland given the impact it had on Labour's footing in the country, a claim rejected by Labour's Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale.
READ MORE: Court battle looms as Holyrood passes alternative Brexit Bill
Lord McConnell, a former Scottish first minister, urged the Government to be more ambitious about its engagement with the devolved administrations, and suggested rotating the role of chair at joint meetings between different governments.
He also said joint ministerial committees "had never worked", adding: "Tony Blair and I both tried to get rid of them, frankly. We didn't succeed, but I wish that we had."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel