THE Home Office is recruiting an additional 1,000 border staff to beef up checks at ports and airports after Brexit, Home Secretary Amber Rudd has announced.
The announcement brings to 1,300 the number of additional border officers who will be in place by the end of the UK’s transition out of the EU in 2021.
The Home Office has already announced a further 1,200 caseworkers to process EU nationals’ claims to settled status in the UK after Brexit, while HM Revenue & Customs is expected to need thousands of staff to deal with extra work.
The announcement came in a bruising clash with Commons Home Affairs Committee chairwoman Yvette Cooper, who questioned whether the Home Secretary was being “honest and open” with the public about immigration.
Ms Rudd repeatedly dodged Ms Cooper’s demand to say whether she was still aiming to meet the Government’s goal of reducing net migration below 100,000 by the time of the 2022 election.
Ms Cooper said that the Government’s target could be met only by transforming the current net immigration of around 100,000 EU citizens into the UK each year into a net outflow of 50,000 after Brexit, given that measures to reduce non-EU immigration had already been tried.
Grilling Ms Rudd, she repeatedly demanded to know if the Home Office was drawing up plans to achieve this.
But the Home Secretary responded only that the target was “challenging”, adding: “It is a concern to many people, particularly the people who voted to leave the EU, that immigration is too high, so I will be making sure that we continue to reduce it.”
She stressed that she was also concerned to help businesses in being able to employ the staff they need and universities to recruit overseas students.
And she declined to say what immigration arrangements the Government was seeking in the agreement on Britain’s future relationship with the EU, saying that this was a matter for Theresa May and Brexit Secretary David Davis.
Ms Cooper told her: “The problem is you have got a net migration target on one hand, you have got some unknown hidden objectives in the negotiations on the other, but none of us have any idea what they are.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here