THE escalating dispute over Brexit powers represents devolution's greatest ever crisis, the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC) leader has warned.
Grahame Smith said that hoarding powers at Westminster for traditionally devolved areas would be “an erosion of devolution”, and said the dispute had “exposed the centralising tendency of Westminster” towards the UK's devolved parliaments.
The STUC general secretary said it also showed how tenuous the devolution settlement was.
However, Smith said it represented the biggest threat to devolution since the Scottish Parliament opened in 1999.
He said: "The current dispute between the Scottish and UK Governments on the EU Withdrawal Bill has served to expose the more fundamental issue of the future governance of the UK post-Brexit.
"It has opened up questions about the nature of devolution in the UK and the role of devolved parliaments, questions that have been largely ignored in the two decades since devolution."
Smith said it would "not be acceptable" for Westminster to adopt the legislative role of Holyrood in any policy areas.
He added: "Whether or not one accepts that the EU’s decision-making processes are undemocratic, it would be unacceptable to replace them processes that are just that.
"The UK Government must accept the legitimacy of devolved institutions and realise that proposals which create a situation where the UK could legislate on any area of devolved competence without the agreement of the Scottish Parliament would be an erosion of devolution and would not be acceptable.
"The recent process has exposed the centralising tendency of Westminster.
"'Taking back control' seems to be a mantra limited to executive power in that jurisdiction alone rather than the expression of a desire to engage and empower communities the length and breadth of the country."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel