Former prime minister Tony Blair has said he has always opposed torture as he insisted he did not know about the case of Libyan dissident Abdul Hakim Belhaj until after leaving office.
Prime Minister Theresa May has apologised to Mr Belhaj and his wife Fatima Boudchar after they said MI6 was involved in their rendition to Libya in 2004.
Mrs May said the couple had suffered “appalling treatment”, and Ms Boudchar, who was pregnant at the time, accepted a £500,000 payout.
Mr Blair, who stood down as PM in 2007, said he had not been aware of the incident while in power, telling BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “This has been subject to a long legal process.
“I have gone along with what the Government’s done, which is issue the apology, I didn’t actually know myself about this case until after I left office.”
Pressed on whether he would give a personal apology to the couple, Mr Blair said: “Of course I’m sorry for any mistreatment that’s been given to people. How on earth would you ever justify that?”
The former PM said: “And, by the way, let me make one thing clear because sometimes people say, you know, I was sort of ambivalent on the use of torture – I have always been wholly and 100% in all circumstances opposed to the use of torture.
“And I have made that clear, publicly, privately in any conversation I have ever had within government.”
Mr Blair added: “This case wasn’t brought to my attention, but… there’s a lot of things in this case, some of which have been out in the media, some of which have not.
“It’s not something I dealt with myself when I was in government. I think that’s all I can say.”
Mr Belhaj says he was tortured during his detention in Libya. Ms Boudchar was also detained, but was released shortly before giving birth.
Tory former foreign secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind has led calls for a parliamentary inquiry into what involvement Mr Blair, and senior ministers at the time, had in the incident.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel