The fight for North Lanarkshire will be one of the fiercest of the local election campaign, reports Gerry Braiden in the third of The Herald's battleground profiles.
After last May's Nationalist tidal wave in Lanarkshire, it was the clearest indication that change may be on the way in Old Labour's last stronghold. After an application to build on a small gap site in Wishaw was passed, groups of middle-class residents in the public galleries began chanting "You're out in May".
Things are often vicious in Lanarkshire. May 3 might well up the ante. Labour has much to lose and even the Politburo of the Peoples' Republic of North Lanarkshire has considered time might be up.
Last May, the SNP broke out of Cumbernauld and into the industrial heartlands of Airdrie, Coatbridge and Motherwell.
A key figure in that success, Holyrood minister Alex Neil, is leading the SNP charge and has been in a public slanging match with council leader, the veteran Jim McCabe.
There are several capable councillors within the Labour administration and the party can knock on doors talking up some policy successes such as schools investments and employability initiatives in the face of ever-declining budgets.
It can also point to an inexperienced SNP group, riven with factionalism and driven from the back seat by Government ministers, while Labour believes it is having considerable success picking off individual Nationalist councillors and candidates.
The rise of the SNP machine in recent years has left it short on experience and talent at local levels and while current SNP leader David Stocks is by all accounts a decent sort, it may not be enough to hold together an administration.
And Labour has a lot to lose, beyond power and the perks of office.
The dynasties of Frank Roy, Helen Liddell, John Reid and Jack McConnell, the backbone of west of Scotland Labour for a generation, will fall like a pack of cards if North Lanarkshire goes to the SNP.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article