SCOTLAND'S councils will share just under £10 billion next year, with unions saying local government was bearing the brunt of austerity measures and Labour claiming it ignores the impact on jobs.
Finance Secretary John Swinney said the deal for the 32 local authorities was the "best outcome that can be achieved in the current financial climate", with some of the cash conditional on agreement to continue the council-tax freeze and meet commitments on teacher employment.
He said the £9.9bn for 2013-14, which includes cash from non-domestic rates, "represents an increase in funding for councils of £35.2 million for new or extended service delivery".
The overall settlement is down £1.6bn on last year, but that is almost exclusively due to changes in how the police and fire and rescue services are funded following their reform.
But this has been queried by Cosla, the umbrella body for all councils, which said it does not give authorities more money and is no more than deals done with the Government.
Councils who do not agree to the conditions on the employment of teachers and the council-tax freeze will "not receive their full share of the package of resources", Mr Swinney said.
Unison immediately called for a scrapping of the council tax freeze, with Stephanie Herd, chairwoman of the union's Scottish local government committee, adding: "These allocations are often discussed in terms of council winners or losers. But the reality is all of our communities are losing out, across Scotland.
"We need an end to the council-tax freeze and take action to make the tax fairer. We need to enable councils to continue providing vital services rather than impose damaging cuts or punitive charges."
Labour's Sarah Boyack said the settlement would be "tough across Scotland", adding "The cabinet Secretary calls this a fair budget.
"Where is the analysis on the impact on jobs and the people who rely on services who will see their services cut or increased charges?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article