Stalling for time
WE ARE delighted to note that Scottish politics is in such rude health that all the stalls were let long ago for the forthcoming Labour conference in three weeks' time. At least that's what Yes Scotland were told when they asked to hire space in Inverness. Allan Grogan of Labour for Independence moaned: "It's another example of the lack of democracy in the Labour Party in Scotland. We have never even had a vote on the issue but they are denying members access even to the most basic information on the case for independence."
It couldn't be (1)
NO, IT couldn't be, could it? Has the famous sultan of spin been hiding in the cupboard under the No 10 stairs to emerge all these years later without anyone noticing? Downing Street has a new member of staff, who has already been putting out emails. The person in question is called none other than . . . Alastair Campbell.
One can imagine David Cameron's eyebrows rising with alarm when he found out that there was someone working in No 10 with the same name as Tony Blair's former communications chief. Despite the fact the new AC is tall and has Scots ancestry, I'm told, sadly, it's not the same person. That really would have been fun.
It couldn't be (2)
WE HAVE similar feelings of "Surely not?" at the latest missive from Patrick Harvie of the Greens, atheism's chief envoy at Holyrood, and organiser of the forthcoming visit of AC Grayling, high priest of the anti-God sect, to deliver the Time for Reflection homily in the Chamber. Why was Harvie putting out a press release headed: "GOD IS RIGHT: SCOTLAND CAN DESIGN A BETTER TAX SYSTEM"? Closer inspection revealed GOD was former top mandarin Sir Gus O'Donnell, pictured, who said in a new book that parts of the UK tax system were "bonkers".
Juice wars
HAVEN'T Messrs AG Barr heard of the maxim that there is no such thing as bad publicity? "We would ask all political parties to respect Irn-Bru's neutrality on the question of independence and other political matters," they said, demanding the withdrawal by the SNP of a T-shirt sporting their colours with an "I'm Yes" logo. We were hoping for all-out constitutional cola wars, with Coke batting for a No vote (or perhaps Indy Lite) and Pepsi fronting up for Devo Max. As for Angostura Bitters Together, let's not go there.
Destiny's hamster
MOMENTOUS, historic, date with destiny – just a few of the descriptions bandied by Alex Salmond as he named the date of the independence referendum. But what was the most-read story on BBC Scotland's website that day? Mr Salmond may have been a little disappointed to learn it was "Hamster found wandering in blizzard."
Pushing the vote
Holyrood's referendum bill committee received a letter from Harry Hayfield, from Ceredigion in Wales, on behalf of a pal living in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. His chum was "at least 10% Scottish," was an independence supporter and wanted a vote in the referendum, he said. What are the chances? No chance, unfortunately for Mr Hayfield's friend. Apart from 16 and 17-year-olds, the franchise is the same as for Holyrood elections. In other words, you don't get a vote even if you have a Gettysburg address.
Posh nosh
BBC journalists striking over job cuts brought along a selection of tasty homemade delicacies to sustain them through a protest outside the corporation's Pacific Quay HQ in Glasgow. Muffins, pakora and garlic mushrooms in pitta bread were all handed round. National Union of Journalists officials, however, seemed concerned the fayre was insufficiently militant. "Can we please send out for some rolls and square sausage?" one was overheard to say.
Unspun can be contacted at
unspun@theherald.co.uk or
twitter: @Unspunherald
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article