SNP Ministers are refusing to make public a secret dossier drawn up to identify the risks to Scotland of the independence referendum.
The decision to block release of the internal "risk register" on the 2014 poll means voters will not be able to find out the potential hazards flagged up by Scottish Government civil servants.
The refusal to publish – which Labour has put down to the SNP's "secrecy obsession" – will now be investigated by the country's Information tsar.
Risk registers, which are compiled by government bodies to outline the dangers of policies, shot up the political agenda last year during the debate over the UK Government's controversial health legislation.
Health Secretary Andrew Lansley declined to hand over the register for a Bill that laid the foundations for sweeping changes to the NHS.
However, the UK Information Commissioner then ruled there was "considerable public interest" in disclosure, while the Information Tribunal also ordered release.
Lansley wielded his FOI veto to block publication, arguing that Ministers needed a "safe space" in which to conduct policy.
Now the Scottish Government finds itself embroiled in a similar row after the Sunday Herald asked Ministers for a copy of all risk registers on their policy of holding a constitutional referendum.
Although the Government confirmed holding the documents, the request was turned down on the grounds that Scottish Ministers required a "private space" for seeking advice. The SNP government has no intention of publishing the risk register before the independence referendum is held.
The response added that the benefit of the risk "process" could only occur "if the risk register includes all possible risks, however unlikely it is that some of them may be realised".
An internal review of the decision also backed secrecy, with officials noting that the register was an "assessment ... based on what might hypothetically happen rather than fact".
The review, conducted by an official in the Government's International Division, concluded that it was in the public interest for Ministers to receive advice "which includes a comprehensive assessment of all risk".
The register is likely to dwell on the legality of the Scottish Parliament being able to stage an independence referendum.
UK Ministers believe a plebiscite can only be organised by Holyrood if the specific power to do so is devolved, whereas the Scottish Government is adamant the power is already within the Parliament's gift.
The dispute over the public release of the risk register will be adjudicated on by Scotland's new Information Commissioner, Rosemary Agnew. If she orders publication, Ministers could challenge it in the courts.
The First Minister also possesses a veto, but this is a nuclear option that he can only use if the information is deemed to be of "exceptional sensitivity".
The decision to block release of the risk dossier comes amid fears the Government is taking an unduly conservative attitude towards Freedom of Information (FoI) legislation and the constitution.
It was revealed recently that civil servants had been invited to attend two "constitutional reform" seminars on FoI.
An advert noted the sessions would list "the steps that should be taken in responding to FoIs, using FoIs we have already received on constitutional reform as case studies".
It emerged last month that the Government had refused to confirm or deny whether it held legal advice about an independent Scotland's membership of the European Union.
The Information Commissioner, in a landmark decision, ordered Ministers to reveal whether the advice exists.
As an MP, Salmond was a strong voice for open government, and regularly called on the previous Labour government to release the secret legal advice it received prior to the invasion of Iraq.
Sir Alistair Graham, the former Chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, said: "There is nothing the public hates more than hypocrisy. If there is seen to be a difference between Alex Salmond's demands earlier in his career and the way he has acted as a Minister, then the public will take a very dim view of this matter."
Patricia Ferguson, Scottish Labour's Shadow Cabinet Secretary for External Affairs, said: "At every turn, the SNP are determined to keep the details of separation from the Scottish people and Salmond's secrecy obsession is becoming more worrying by the day."
Green MSP Patrick Harvie said: "Sadly the SNP's general attitude towards FoI leaves a lot to be desired."
Scottish LibDem leader Willie Rennie said: "People need to know the risks involved around the independence debate but the SNP would prefer to keep them in the dark."
A spokesman for the Scottish Government said: "The Scottish Government is committed to proactively publishing information whenever possible – this decision is fully in accordance with Freedom of Information legislation."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article