A WOMAN with learning difficulties was stripped of sickness benefits after going through a lengthy fitness-for-work assessment without realising she was being tested.
The 57-year-old, who has not been named, went without food for a week because of the cut to her benefits, her family claimed.
She was left destitute after undergoing a Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) work capability assessment as part of the Government's drive to move claimants off sickness benefits.
As a result of the tests, the woman was declared fit to work without understanding the purpose of the detailed process, which was carried out by private contractor Atos.
The case emerged during an ill-tempered and often unruly meeting of Holyrood's welfare reform committee yesterday, when MSPs were reprimanded for haranguing DWP officials.
Michael McMahon, the committee convener, said he had been contacted by the family of the 57-year-old woman, who believed she had been tricked out of benefits.
The woman did not go to a mainstream school and has never had a job, he said.
"The family discovered she had been living for over a week without any food because her benefits had been taken away from her," he said.
"When asked why this had happened, she said she had not understood what had happened. She didn't know there had been any assessment made. She was not aware of how the decision had been made to remove her benefits."
Mr McMahon said Atos had been able to provide details of the assessment process in the case.
But he added: "That woman didn't realise she had gone through the assessment process, so incapable was she of understanding it.
"And yet the conclusion was that she was fit for work, something she has never managed to do in her 57 years on this planet."
The details were put to Bill Gunnyeon, the DWP's chief medical adviser, as he gave evidence to the committee.
He said the case "clearly does sound concerning".
Mr Gunnyeon told MSPs: "As a healthcare professional myself, clearly I am concerned. And obviously, if we don't get it right, we need to learn from that.
"We need to look at why, on any occasion, we failed to get it right, and make sure that we adjust the system accordingly."
During the meeting, SNP MSPs were reprimanded for repeatedly haranguing DWP officials, describing their evidence as "nonsense" and "claptrap".
In one outburst, Pete Searle, the department's director of strategy, was shouted down when he suggested smaller properties were available for residents set to lose out as a result of the "bedroom tax".
Conservative committee member Alex Johnstone, speaking after the meeting, said: "It was a pathetic and puerile performance that was not worthy of any parliament, let alone Holyrood."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article