THE STUC has given strong backing to the Scottish Government's plans for an independence referendum in autumn 2014, including the idea of a second question on what it calls "enhanced devolution".
Meanwhile, the think-tank behind a "devo plus" option has called for the Office for Budget Responsibility to come up with accurate costings on all taxation raised in Scotland so people know where they stand before voting.
And in a third response to the UK Government's consultation on the referendum, the Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations backed giving the vote to 16-year-olds.
The response of the STUC will be particularly welcomed by the Government, given that it endorses various strands of referendum policy, from timing and votes for 16-year-olds through to backing for a second question, and says Westminster must not seek to impose conditions.
General secretary Grahame Smith says the STUC recognises the "enormous value" of Westminster passing a Section 30 order under the Scotland Act, giving Holyrood full authority to conduct the referendum, but says it does "not consider it appropriate to place pre-conditions" on this.
He said: "STUC does not oppose a 2014 referendum and sees some advantages to this timescale which would allow for the resolution of all matters of process, for ensuring the proper legal basis for the referendum is clearly established, and for ensuring that the people of Scotland are able to engage in the widest possible debate on the constitutional future of our country."
He said it would be inappropriate to rule out an enhanced devolution third option.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article