ED Balls has insisted Labour is committed to the so-called "triple lock" on state pensions after the Tories claimed the Opposition was lining up pensions for cuts after it admitted they would be included in Labour's proposed welfare cap.
The Shadow Chancellor said the "clear large bulk" of social security spend went to the over 60. Those costs must be included in an overall welfare bill limit he said.
Pressed on whether the state pension would be covered by his proposed cap on large sections of the social security budget, Mr Balls said: "At the moment, our plan is to include it."
He went on: "For the cap to work vigorously we have got to be looking ahead and I have got to be saying to these spending ministers – look three years ahead, you are going off track, do what needs to be done now."
Asked if he was prepared to limit pension rises if spending was in danger of breaching the cap, Mr Balls replied: "That is not our intention at all."
Aides to George Osborne said basic pension spending would be excluded from the welfare cap the Chancellor is due to unveil this month.
Matthew Hancock, Tory Business Minister and Mr Osborne's ex-chief of staff, tweeted: "Amazing. Balls admits that when Labour say they will cap benefits, what they mean is they will cap pensions of people who have worked hard."
The Shadow Chancellor responded: "We're com-mitted to triple-lock on state pension. Got to monitor long-term pension spend. Tory reaction very rattled."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article