HE'S been away far too long.
Gordon Brown – remember him?– made a fleeting appearance on the Westminster hill last night, as the ex-Monarch of the Glen returned after a year's absence to try to save the jobs of disabled Remploy workers in Fife from Coalition cuts.
It was an end of-day Adjournment debate, which normally means attendance is by three MPs, the Deputy Assistant Speaker and a few Westminster mice looking for nourishment.
But on this occasion, Gordy, back for one night only, was "doughnutted" by loyal colleagues. An array of the new Tory intake, who had never seen the ex-premier in parliament, also hung around to catch the Big Beast strut and fret his quarter hour upon the stage.
It was interesting to see how the brooding figure of curiosity still commanded the green benches, still had presence, still made his arguments with force and passion. While there were loyal Brownites gathered round their fallen leader, the one-time Chancellor Alistair Darling was seen hanging back at the other end of the chamber to spy his old frenemy.
The familiar Brown mannerisms returned as he pointed fingers and curved hands to insist that the Coalition had to save two local factories which employed thousands of disabled people to make lifejackets. Better to keep them going while a private buyer could be found than see the jobs move to Asia.
But Esther McVey, the Tory Business Minister, hit back with a string of Whitehall numbers, insisting a previous government modernisation plan totalling £500m had failed and spoke of viability and feasibility, etc, etc. Gordy sunk his chin deep into his chest, glowered at the minister and looked unimpressed.
After the Dundee champion Jim McGovern stood up and tried for the umpteenth time to intervene on Ms McVey, she suddenly sat down.
Was that it, asked Speaker Bercow? It was, she replied.
Gordy picked up his papers and left, not before getting a warm handshake from the Speaker, who said something to make the former Labour leader roar with laughter. He'll be back.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article