THE Coalition's bonfire of the quangos over the last two years has saved £1.4 billion and is on target to save the taxpayer £2.6 billion by 2015, or £150 per household, Francis Maude, the Cabinet Office minister, announced.
So far, 106 public bodies have been closed with another 150 merged into 70. The aim over the next three years is to cut Britain's quangocracy by a total of more than 300 bodies.
"In 2010, we inherited a bloated quangocracy that had spiralled out of control," explained Mr Maude. "Not only were these unaccountable bodies costing the taxpayer billions but they were duplicating bureaucracy."
He said in the past people had "just talked the talk on quango reform" but the Coalition took swift action by legislating to enable departments to deliver reforms by closing down unnecessary public bodies.
"The changes we have already made will save £1.4 billion but by 2015 the Government will save the taxpayer a total of more than £2.6 billion."
The minister pointed out that the closure of 106 bodies together with the merger of 150 more into 70 meant the Coalition was only halfway through the first phase of its programme.
Mr Maude insisted the UK Government had been more transparent about quangos and who works for them than any previous government.
Among those quangos to have closed, include the regional development agencies in England, 11 school bodies south of the Border, canals and waterways bodies across the UK and the Child Support Agency.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article