BRITAIN is losing the war against internet crime, an influential group of MPs has warned.
One estimate of its cost to the UK is £1.8bn a year, or £144 per victim.
Despite being the pre-ferred target of online criminals in 25 countries, Britain was still "complacent" towards e-crime as victims are "hidden in cyberspace", the Commons Home Affairs Committee said in a hard-hitting report today.
It argued there was insufficient funding and resources for tackling online crime, which includes identity theft, industrial espionage, credit card fraud and child exploitation.
Tougher sentences for online criminals and improved training for police officers are recommended by the committee to deal with the growing e-crime threat.
"We are not winning the war on online criminal activity," said Labour's Keith Vaz, the committee chairman. "The threat of a cyber attack to the UK is so serious it is marked as a higher threat than a nuclear attack."
He pointed out that someone could steal more on the internet than by robbing a bank and online criminals in 25 countries had chosen the UK as their number one target.
Detective Chief Superintendent Charlie McMurdie, head of the Police Central e-Crime Unit, told the MPs that e-crime sentences were too lenient, with hackers who cost Paypal more than £3.5m given sentences of seven to 18 months.
The committee also called for a service similar to anti-online child abuse group Internet Watch Foundation to be formed for tackling the spread of terrorist material online.
"Young people are increasingly radicalised online by the words of radical clerics such as Anwar al-Awlaki on YouTube or internet magazine Inspire.
"What starts on the web, ends up on the streets of Woolwich," warned Mr Vaz.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article