David Cameron has said it is "right" that the Tories and Liberal Democrats give up a £520,000 bequest from a former nurse amid confusion over whether she actually meant the money to go to the Government.
The Prime Minister said the wording of Joan Edwards' will made clear her intention was for the money to "benefit the nation" rather than political parties.
The legacy, disclosed along with other donations yesterday, sparked a row after a copy of the document emerged. Conservative and LibDem officials previously briefed that they had split the money because it was earmarked for "whichever party was in government".
But the text obtained by the Daily Mail showed Miss Edwards - who died in September aged 90 - identified the beneficiary as "whichever government is in office at the date of my death".
As the backlash gathered pace, both coalition partners declared they would hand the funds to the Treasury as a gesture of good faith.
However, shortly afterwards the executors of Miss Edwards' will, Bristol solicitors Davis Wood, released a statement insisting she had indeed intended the cash to go to political parties rather than the Government.
"It was confirmed by Miss Edwards at the time of her instruction that her estate was to be left to whichever party formed the government at the date of her death, " the law firm said.
Speaking during a visit to the Commonwealth Games site in Glasgow, Tory leader Mr Cameron said: "It is a slightly confusing situation.
"But I think when you look at the wording of the will it seems to us the intention was more to benefit the nation, so what we've done is give it to the Treasury so it can help to pay down the national debt."
LibDem leader and deputy prime minister Nick Clegg personally approved the forfeiting of the party's £100,000 share yesterday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article