PRESSURE is mounting on David Cameron over his role in getting a newspaper to destroy classified information divulged by the American whistleblower Edward Snowden.
Yvette Cooper, the Shadow Home Secretary, has called for Westminster's intelligence watchdog to investigate the extent of Mr Cameron's involvement after it emerged he had directed Sir Jeremy Heywood, the Cabinet Secretary, to contact the Guardian.
Keith Vaz, her Labour colleague who chairs the Commons Home Affairs Committee, demanded the PM make a full statement to MPs when they return to Westminster next month given No 10's direct intervention.
This came to light following the detention at Heathrow Airport under counter-terrorism laws of David Miranda, the partner of Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald, who has worked with Mr Snowden, a former US National Security Agency worker, on a series of security services exposes.
Yesterday, Mr Cameron's colleagues came out to defend his actions.
Nick Clegg, it emerged, had agreed to the move against the Guardian on the understanding that destruction of the classified material would not impinge on its ability to publish articles.
A spokesman for the Deputy Prime Minster said: "We understand the concerns about recent events, particularly around issues of freedom of the press and civil liberties. The independent reviewer of terrorism legislation is already looking into the circumstances around the detention of David Miranda."
William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, said: "The Government clearly has a duty if information is held insecurely and could be damaging to our national security to try to make sure that it is recovered or destroyed. It's a very simple matter."
But Ms Cooper suggested the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) should now look at the Coalition's move against the Guardian.
"We don't know what was on the (hard drives) or what the material was that the Government was pursuing.
"However, this may be another area where an inquiry by the ISC may be the way forward in terms of this case."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article