THE Campaign for Borders Rail has insisted that a re-opened Waverley Line is viable.
Simon Walton, who chairs the campaign, denied the controversial £350 million project was ever predicated on new housing along the route but was about righting the long-standing social injustice that the people of Midlothian and the Borders were deprived of access to the rail network. He said: "Every single study, prior to the opening of a railway project this century has grossly underestimated the patronage, and has failed to take into account the wider social and economic benefits accrued."
The Herald reported on Saturday that consultants believed the numbers who would make return journeys between Edinburgh and Tweeddale would fall from 976,000 to 647,000 if new housing was not built along the route.
Mr Walton said: "If the snapshot report by Ernst & Young for Transport Scotland had been compiled at a peak rather than a trough in the economic cycle, the findings would be different, and much more positive. Furthermore, it should be noted significant work has already started, and that contracts have been signed by the Transport Minister Keith Brown for the construction of the line."
He said comparisons with the Edinburgh tram project are unjust. "While funding of the Borders Railway was subject to some experimental schemes, it is in the hands of Network Rail and its contractors, who have considerable experience in the field, and are demonstrating such up and down the route already."
Mr Walton hit out at former councillor Nicholas Watson, a critic of the line, claiming it was such opposition which had led to cost increases and led to him being rejected at the ballot box. He added: "Business bodies such as the Federation of Small Businesses and the Borders Chamber of Commerce have pledged their support."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article