UK CLIMATE change ministers and officials spent £1.5 million on flights in two years, with £250,000 racked up on domestic journeys, research has found.
Department of Energy and Climate Change (DEDD) personnel booked seats between London and Aberdeen, where its North Sea inspectors work. Flights from London to Manchester and Glasgow and between Aberdeen and Norwich, Southampton and Humberside were also recorded.
The TaxPayers' Alliance found some flights were taken in business class, with one £460 flight from Aberdeen to London, and two Manchester to London flights at £188 each.
Since May 2010, the post of energy secretary has been filled by the Liberal Democrats, who want higher taxes on domestic flights "for which alternative, less polluting travel is readily available".
Matthew Sinclair, of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: "Despite being one of the departments making air travel more expensive for people paying their own way, the Department of Energy and Climate Change has spent an astonishing amount of taxpayers' money. This looks like breathtaking hypocrisy.
"Officials urgently need to explain why they spend so much money on so many business class flights in particular."
The most expensive of the 3496 flights taken over the last two-and-a-half years was a business class booking from Cancun to London following an international climate change conference. Business class tickets were booked for 362 trips at a cost of nearly £600,000.
A DECC spokesman said: "The department's international work, which includes securing the nation's future energy supplies, carrying out negotiations with other countries and international organisations on energy issues, and regulating the North Sea oil and gas industry among other things, means that sometimes air travel is unavoidable."
It said they were careful to ensure the trips were cost-effective.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article